The world is full of wonderous things that evoke our admiration. Some authors, accordingly, have used the natural world to argue for the existance of the deity. Is the fact that this is "the best of all possible worlds" a sound basis for a logical argument?
Given that Intelligent Design has no power to explain anything better than simply to say that a thing is not explainable, what would be the point behind promoting I. D.?
What do you feel are the flaws in the use of complex systems as proof of design?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.